![]() I tried to cost out the annual strategic plan for a small firm of 10 employees. If your project is complex, however, the software is not up to the demands. There are a few annoyances (like why is there a 7% increase in resource costs if input as $$/year instead of $$/mo or $$/hr?) that you have to work around, but the iTaskX is very serviceable. The input is straightforward, and there's ample help. The software is well-suited to relatively simple projects of a few hundred tasks and a dozen resources. We purchases iTaskX about 6 months ago, and I've used it in several applications. The WBS code that can be a custom coded (I use CSA codes for tasks) and the report for the project that is more document or export to pages /Word for a friendlier format than a grid. ![]() I am waiting on two functions that would make me lead our project team completely away from MS Project 1. I did not consider it in my final purchase for several reasons one was its interoperability with MS Project. I am very comfortable with MS project in all its forms but I use this Project Management Software the most of all PMP software we own. Each time I have had a question for the iTaskX team they come back with a real solution in a fast (read non-critical path) reply. Since I stay on the bleeding edge of the OS X operating system, I have had small problems with 3rd party software. This new version does native file extension exports, for everything up to MS Project 2012. The older versions of iTaskX would read and write to MS Project without issue as long as you saved it as an xml version for import into the MS Project 20 versions. It's workflow is very easy to start a project with a step by step wizard type form you can use to get the basics of your project recorded. I have been using the iTaskX since version 2.6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |